Abstract The additionality of forest conservation interventions is frequently questioned. In particular, they are often considered to be located in places where forests are not threatened, which points to the existence of location biases. Revisiting this location bias concept, we conceptually distinguish potential and effective additionality and theoretically consider how the objectives of the implementer affect the siting choice of the forest conservation interventions and their additionality. Our theoretical intuition is that the choices of the implementers are influenced by the quality of institutions. Our results show that (1) the implementer's objective and local institutions may lead the implementer to select a site with low development potential and low forest threat, and (2) the selection of a site with low development potential, which is frequently presented as a location bias, does not necessarily preclude additionality.

Philippe Delacote

Gwenolé Le Velly

Gabriela Simonet

Environment and Development Economics

Environment and Development Economics is positioned at the intersection of environmental, resource and development economics. The Editor and Associate Editors, supported by a distinguished panel of advisors from around the world, aim to encourage submissions from researchers in the field in both developed and developing countries. The Journal is divided into two main sections, Theory and Applications, which includes regular academic papers and Policy Options, which includes papers that may be of interest to the wider policy community. Environment and Development Economics also publishes occasional Policy Fora (discussions based on a focal paper). From time to time the journal publishes special issues based on a particular theme.

Environment and Development Economics is situated at the intersection of environmental, resource, and development economics. The Editor and Associate Editors, supported by a distinguished panel of advisors from around the world, aim to encourage submissions from researchers in both developed and developing countries. The journal is divided into two main sections: Theory and Applications, which includes regular academic papers, and Policy Options, which features papers that may be of interest to the broader policy community. Environment and Development Economics also publishes occasional Policy Fora, which are discussions based on a focal paper. From time to time, the journal publishes special issues centered around a particular theme.

《Environment and Development Economics》期刊位于环境经济学、资源经济学和发展经济学的交汇处。编辑和副编辑在来自世界各地的杰出顾问的支持下，旨在鼓励来自发达国家和发展中国家的研究人员提交论文。期刊分为两个主要部分：理论与应用，包括常规学术论文；政策选项，包括可能对更广泛政策社区感兴趣的论文。《Environment and Development Economics》还不定期发布政策论坛（基于焦点论文的讨论）。此外，期刊还会不时发布基于特定主题的特刊。

Category	Quartile
经济学	4
经济学, 经济学	4
经济学, 环境研究	4

Distinguishing potential and effective additionality of forest conservation interventions

ivySCI AI Smartly Parses PDF, Answers Researchers' Questions, and Helps You Understand Papers in Seconds

Journal Info

Category	Quartile
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES	3