Purpose: This study examined modulation interference in sentence recognition for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users.Methods: Thirteen bimodal users and thirteen normal-hearing (NH) listeners (reference) participated in this study. The adaptive Korean Matrix sentence-in-noise test measured the speech reception thresholds (SRTs) required for 50% speech-in-noise intelligibility. As background noise, we presented two background noises: stationary speech-shaped noise (SSN) and single-talker speech-modulated masker (International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology noise, ICRA). The amount of masking release due to fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise, called speech masking release (SMR), was calculated from the difference between SRTs with SSN and SRTs with ICRA noise. The SRTs were measured twice for bimodal CI users: CI-only and bimodal listening.Results: The mean SMR for NH listeners was approximately 12 dB. The mean SMR for bimodal CI users was about -5 dB, with either CI alone or bimodal listening. This means that bimodal CI users experienced modulation interference rather than masking release from the temporal fluctuations. We observed positive bimodal benefits, yet the interference from fluctuating maskers was similar between the CI-only and bimodal listening. The low-frequency aided hearing thresholds in the non-implanted ear were unrelated to the amount of SMR for bimodal users.Conclusion: NH listeners could take advantage of temporal fluctuations in the speech-modulated noise. However, bimodal CI listeners hardly glimpsed target speech in the dips of the speech-modulated masker, regardless of listening mode. Bimodal listening did not significantly reduce modulation interference compared to CI-only listening.

Jae Ho Han

Modulation Interference from Speech-Modulated Noise in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

ivySCI AI Smartly Parses PDF, Answers Researchers' Questions, and Helps You Understand Papers in Seconds

Journal Info