Research Driven Dialogs (RDDs) are a method for collective sense-making and collaborative reflection on research findings by a range of stakeholders hoping to better understand and address a complex problem. Research findings are opened up through a process of dialog; implications for practice and action are co-designed by participants in ways that are compatible with institutional and sociocultural realities. RDDs thereby coproduce knowledge in ways that maximize social impact and deepen and contextualize scholarly insights without imposing excessive time-burdens on stakeholders. We present an overview of the stages of RDDs through a development leadership project in Sri Lanka and Indonesia, outlining how these can be designed to maximize research outcomes and extraneous benefits.

Tanya Jakimow

Mario Gomez

Viyanga Gunasekera

Aida Fitri Harahap

Asima Yanty Siahaan

Nadine Vanniasinkam

Ramona Vijeyarasa

None Yumasdaleni

Field Methods

Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is devoted to articles about the methods used by field wzorkers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for the collection, management, and analysis data about human thought and/or human behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on the reporting of research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. High-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods-- from scientific or interpretative traditions-- dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions are all welcome in the pages of the journal.

Field Methods (formerly Cultural Anthropology Methods) is dedicated to articles about the methods used by field workers in the social and behavioral sciences and humanities for collecting, managing, and analyzing data about human thought and behavior in the natural world. Articles should focus on innovations and issues in the methods used, rather than on reporting research or theoretical/epistemological questions about research. We welcome high-quality articles using qualitative and quantitative methods—from scientific or interpretative traditions—dealing with data collection and analysis in applied and scholarly research from writers in the social sciences, humanities, and related professions.

《Field Methods》（前称《文化人类学方法》）专注于社会科学、行为科学和人文学科领域的田野工作者所使用的方法，旨在收集、管理和分析关于人类思想和行为的数据。文章应着重于方法的创新和相关问题，而非研究结果或理论/认识论问题的报告。我们欢迎来自社会科学、人文学科及相关专业的作者提交高质量的文章，这些文章可以采用定性或定量方法，涉及应用和学术研究中的数据收集与分析。

Category	Quartile
社会学	3
社会学, 人类学	3
社会学, 社会科学跨领域	4

Research Driven Dialogs: A Method for Social and Scholarly Impact

ivySCI AI Smartly Parses PDF, Answers Researchers' Questions, and Helps You Understand Papers in Seconds

Journal Info

Category	Quartile
SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY	2