CJAE 为农业、环境、食品和资源经济学领域的学术研究提供了一个论坛。 CJAE 发表一系列理论、应用和政策相关的文章。

The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics provides an important forum for academic research in the fields of agricultural, environmental, food, and resource economics. The journal publishes a range of theoretical, applied, and policy-related articles, aiming to promote knowledge exchange and development in these areas.

《Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics》为农业、环境、食品和资源经济学领域的学术研究提供了一个重要的论坛。该期刊发表一系列理论、应用和政策相关的文章，旨在促进相关领域的知识交流与发展。

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Abstract We examine the effect of emissions pricing on the cost of Canadian food. We describe emissions pricing policies relevant to the agriculture and food sectors and the differing design details of various provincial systems and the federal Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act . To quantify the potential effect of such policies, we use a detailed input‐output model of Canada's economy to estimate both the direct and indirect cost increases across sectors. We also explore how exemptions and policy design can mitigate what would otherwise be larger effects. In particular, imported inputs, generous exemptions for most direct emissions in primary agriculture, and special provisions for large industrial emitters all dampen the effect. Overall, we find that emissions pricing at $80 per tonne could potentially increase the cost of domestically produced food by approximately 0.8% on average. Combined with imported food that is not directly affected by emissions pricing, we find an average effect of approximately 0.5%. While we abstract from general equilibrium responses, our analysis suggests emissions pricing in Canada has only a modest effect on food costs.

Trevor Tombe

Jennifer Winter

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie

From farms to tables: Quantifying the effect of emissions pricing on canadian food prices

从农场到餐桌：量化排放定价对加拿大食品价格的影响

Abstract This paper develops a sequential game‐theoretic model of technology licensing with heterogeneous firms and consumers in a mixed oligopoly to systematically analyze the optimal licensing decision of the cooperative and the market and welfare impacts of cooperative involvement in the licensing of cost‐reducing process innovations. Analytical results show that the organizational form does matter in technology licensing; cooperative behavior differs from that of its investor‐owned counterparts yielding significantly different equilibrium outcomes in mixed oligopolies where the cooperative is the licensor of the process innovation involved. While our analysis focuses on cost‐reducing process innovations, our results are more general and hold also for quality‐enhancing product innovations.

Ahmed Chennak

Konstantinos Giannakas

Technology transfer in mixed oligopolies: The role of cooperatives

混合寡头垄断中的技术转移：合作社的作用

Abstract Framing the same information in different ways can influence consumers’ decision making. This study assesses the impacts of information framing tools on consumer preference for a relatively novel food biotechnology tool – Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR). Using an online survey of U.S. orange juice consumers, we randomized consumers into a control and two treatment groups (gain vs. loss framing) and used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to measure and compare consumers’ preferences across treatments. We find that both frames are effective in reducing the degree of aversion towards CRISPR, but the gain frame carries a stronger effect.

Glory Esohe Orivri

Bachir Kassas

John Lai

Lisa House

Rodolfo M. Nayga

The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing

信息框架对基因编辑消费者偏好的影响

Abstract Grocery stockpiling is a common behavioral response to the emergence of disasters or heightened uncertainty. Nonetheless, the phenomenon and methods for mitigating it are not well understood. Using a model of household shopping and inventory management, we conceptualize stockpiling as a result of an increase in the fixed cost of making grocery shopping trips, or the opportunity cost of time associated with shopping. In a laboratory experiment, we find that stockpiling increases (decreases) by 78 and 41% (22%) with an increase in fixed costs and price reductions (imposition of purchase limits), respectively. We also find that stockpiling leads to fewer (more) grocery trips by 33 and 22% (36%) under the same three conditions, respectively. Our experiment and subsequent cluster analysis suggest that loss aversion suppresses stockpiling. Our experiment shows that imposing purchase limits, a common retail response to stock‐outs, can trigger stockpiling during shopping trips without purchase limits. Although we do not claim external validity, our study suggests that store managers and policymakers should be careful about solutions during a stockpiling event, such that they do not exacerbate stockpiling, which may disproportionately affect vulnerable groups and disrupt supply chains.

Ahmad Zia Wahdat

Jayson L. Lusk

Understanding the determinants of consumer grocery stockpiling behavior

理解消费者囤积食品杂货行为的影响因素

Abstract This study conducts a meta‐regression analysis to synthesize the marginal effects of 12 factors that frequently appear in empirical studies examining farmer's technology adoption behavior. The analysis includes 187 observational studies on technology adoption in agriculture, which are published in 32 peer‐reviewed journals in the broader field of agricultural economics, covering farmer's adoption in 47 countries for a diverse range of agricultural technologies. Using this broad meta‐dataset, we investigate whether each of the 12 determinants has a true effect on technology adoption rates and examine whether Type I and Type II publication bias are present in the adoption literature. Our results reveal that while most determinant factors significantly affect adoption rates, their marginal effects are generally of small magnitude and vary considerably by technology type and country group. Additionally, our results provide evidence of the presence of Type I publication bias in half of the factors considered and Type II publication bias in nearly all, underscoring the need for caution when interpreting results in the adoption literature by researchers and policymakers. Overall, the findings highlight the critical need for proactive measures to address publication bias and promote more transparent and credible research practices in agricultural economics.

Abbreviation	Can. J. Agric. Econ.
Journal Impact	2.44
Quartiles(Global)	ECONOMICS(Q2)

ISSN	0008-3976, 1744-7976
h-index	49

Publication Information	Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell，Publishing cycle: Quarterly，Journal Type: journal，Open Access Journals: No
Basic data	Year of publication: 1952，Proportion of original research papers: 88.89%，Self Citation Rate:0.00%， Gold OA Rate: 27.14%
Average review cycle	网友分享经验：>36周，或约稿
Average recruitment ratio	网友分享经验：容易

Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics

Journal Citation Format

A journal article with 1 author

A journal article with 2 authors

A journal article with 3 authors

A journal article with 5 or more authors

Books Citation Format

Thesis Citation Format

Web sites Citation Format

Patent Citation Format

Staying up late manually editing references? ivySCI automatically matches journals and helps you generate references with a single click.

Share Submission Experience

From farms to tables: Quantifying the effect of emissions pricing on canadian food prices

Technology transfer in mixed oligopolies: The role of cooperatives

The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing

Understanding the determinants of consumer grocery stockpiling behavior

Factors shaping innovative behavior: A meta‐analysis of technology adoption studies in agriculture

From farms to tables: Quantifying the effect of emissions pricing on canadian food prices

Technology transfer in mixed oligopolies: The role of cooperatives

The impacts of message framing on consumer preferences for gene editing

Understanding the determinants of consumer grocery stockpiling behavior

Factors shaping innovative behavior: A meta‐analysis of technology adoption studies in agriculture