Antipode

AntipodeVolume 45, Issue 5 p. 1047-1049 Intervention Is There Also a Right to the Countryside? Laura Barraclough, Laura Barraclough [email protected] American Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USASearch for more papers by this author Laura Barraclough, Laura Barraclough [email protected] American Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 18 July 2013 https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12040Citations: 7Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. References Attoh K (2011) What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography 35: 669–685 Bacon D (2008) Illegal People: How Globalization Creates Migration and Criminalizes Immigrants. Boston: Beacon Barraclough L (2011) Making the San Fernando Valley: Rural Landscapes, Urban Development, and White Privilege. Athens: University of Georgia Press N Brenner, M Marcuse and M Mayer (eds) (2011) Cities for People, Not For Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. London: Routledge Brown A (2013) The right to the city: Road to Rio 2010. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 957–971 Fenster T (2005) The right to the gendered city: different formations of belonging in everyday life. Journal of Gender Studies 14: 217–231 Garland J and Chakraborti N (2006) "Race", space, and place: examining identity and cultures of exclusion in rural England. Ethnicities 6: 159–177 Gilbert L and Dikeç M (2008) Right to the city: politics of citizenship. In K Goonewardena, S Kipfer, R Milgrom and C Schmid (eds) Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre (pp 250–263). London: Routledge Harrison J and Lloyd S (2012) Illegality at work: deportability and the productive new era of immigration enforcement. Antipode 44(2): 365–385 Harvey D (2008) The right to the city. New Left Review 53: 23–40 Harvey D (2012) Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso Lefebvre H (1996) Writings on Cities (trans E Kofman E and E Lebas). Oxford: Blackwell McCann E (1999) Race, protest, and public space: contextualizing Lefebvre in the US city. Antipode 31(2): 163–184 Merrifield A (2013) The Politics of the Encounter: Urban Theory and Protest Under Planetary Urbanization. Athens: University of Georgia Press Mitchell M (2003) The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York: Guilford Nelson L (2007) Farmworker housing and spaces of belonging in Woodburn, Oregon. Geographical Review 97: 520–541 Nelson L and Nelson P (2011) The global rural: gentrification and linked migration in the rural USA. Progress in Human Geography 35: 441–459 Purcell M (2003) Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 58: 99–108 Purcell M (2008) Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27: 564–590 Right to the City Alliance (2013) Mission and history. http://www.righttothecity.org/index.php/about (last accessed 10 June 2013) T Samara, S He and G Chen (eds) (2013) Locating Right to the City in the Global South. New York: Routledge Citing Literature Volume45, Issue5November 2013Pages 1047-1049 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Laura Barraclough

Is There Also a Right to the Countryside?

是否也存在乡村权利？

Abstract Despite Australian multicultural policy that asserts the right of all citizens to maintain and practice their religion, formal citizenship has not guaranteed the welcome or belonging of migrant religious groups at the neighbourhood scale. This is most starkly reflected in contests over the inclusion of minority religious spaces in the Australian landscape, which increasingly take place in the rural–urban fringe of metropolitan areas. This work examines the controversy over a proposed Hindu temple in metropolitan Sydney and reveals insights into the way that rural–urban fringe space is imagined, understood and experienced by land use planners, residents and temple members. Critical discourse analysis of policy documentation along with interviews reveals that land use planners circumscribe belonging in the landscape through the use of zoning ordinances and design controls, local residents mark the boundaries of white privilege through narratives of heritage and cultural difference and temple members claim rights to citizenship based on assertions of sameness.

Laura Beth Bugg

Citizenship and Belonging in the Rural Fringe: A Case Study of a Hindu Temple in Sydney, Australia

农村边缘的公民身份与归属感：澳大利亚悉尼一座印度教寺庙的案例研究

Abstract: This paper makes two central arguments. First, the popular language of geopolitics needs to be understood as historically emerging from and helping create a “geopolitical social”, which both crosses and crafts traditional borders of internal and external to the national state. Second, we suggest that geoeconomic social forms are gradually supplanting this geopolitical social. After establishing the geopolitical social associated with traditional geopolitics, from Ratzel to Bismarck, we examine the erosion of geopolitical calculation and the rise of the geoeconomic. We trace emerging geoeconomic social forms in three domains: the reframing of territorial security to accommodate supranational flows; the recasting of social forms of security through the market; and the reframing of the state as geoeconomic agent. Neither an exercise in “critical geopolitics” nor an endorsement of Luttwakian style geoeconomics, this paper assumes no straightforward historical succession from geopolitical to geoeconomic logics, but argues that geoeconomics is nonetheless crucial to the spatial reconfiguration of contemporary political geography.

Deborah Cowen

Neil Smith

After Geopolitics? From the Geopolitical Social to Geoeconomics

地缘政治之后？从地缘政治社会到地缘经济学

Abstract: The term “neoliberalism” has come to be used in a wide variety of partly overlapping and partly contradictory ways. This essay seeks to clarify some of the analytical and political work that the term does in its different usages. It then goes on to suggest that making an analytical distinction between neoliberal “arts of government” and the class‐based ideological “project” of neoliberalism can allow us to identify some surprising (and perhaps hopeful) new forms of politics that illustrate how fundamentally polyvalent neoliberal mechanisms of government can be. A range of empirical examples are discussed, mostly coming from my recent work on social policy and anti‐poverty politics in southern Africa.

James Ferguson

The Uses of Neoliberalism

新自由主义的用途

AntipodeVolume 36, Issue 3 p. 527-542 The Limits to Capital: Questions of Provenance and Politics Vinay K Gidwani, Vinay K Gidwani Department of Geography & the Institute for Global Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USASearch for more papers by this author Vinay K Gidwani, Vinay K Gidwani Department of Geography & the Institute for Global Studies, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 26 May 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00430.xCitations: 8Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Althusser L and Balibar E 1997 Reading Capital. London: Verso Butler J 2000 Restaging the universal. In J Butler, E Laclau and S Žižek(eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left(pp 11–43). London: Verso Castree N 1996 Invisible leviathan: Speculations on Marx, Spivak, and the question of value. Rethinking Marxism 9(2): 45–78 Chakrabarty D 1989 Re-thinking Working Class History: Bengal 1890 to 1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Chakrabarty D 1992 Postcoloniality and the artifice of history: Who speaks for “Indian” pasts? Representations 37(Winter): 1–26 Chakrabarty D 1997 The time of history and the times of gods. In D Lloyd and L Lowe(eds) The Politics of Culture in the Shadow of Capital(pp 35–60). Durham: Duke University Press Chakrabarty D 2000a Universalism and belonging in the logic of capital. Public Culture 12(3): 653–678 Chakrabarty D 2000b Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press Deleuze G 1994 Difference and Repetition. Translated by P Patton. New York: Columbia University Press Derrida J 1976 Of Grammatology. Translated by G C Spivak. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press Derrida J 1978 From restricted to general economy: A Hegelianism without reserve. In Writing and Difference(pp 251–277). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Derrida J 1994 Specters of Marx. Translated by P Kamuf. New York: Routledge Dussel E 2001 Towards an Unknown Marx: A Commentary on the Manuscripts of 1861–63. Translated by Y Angulo, edited by Fred Moseley. London: Routledge Forgacs D(ed)(2000 The Antonio Gramsci Reader: Selected Writings 1916–1935. New York: New York University Press Gibson-Graham J K 1996 The End of Capitalism (As we Knew it). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers Hardt M 1993 Gilles Deleuze: An Apprenticeship in Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press Harvey D 1996 Justice, Nature & the Geography of Difference. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Harvey D 1999 The Limits to Capital, new edition. London: Verso Harvey D 2000 Spaces of Hope. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press Herod A 2001 Labour Geographies: Workers and the Landscapes of Capitalism. London: Guilford Press Jani P 2002 Karl Marx, eurocentrism, and the 1857 Revolt in British India. In C Bartolovich and N Lazarus(eds) Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies(pp 81–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Laclau E 1990 New Reflections on the Revolution of our Time. London: Verso Laclau E 2000 Identity and hegemony: The role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In J Butler, E Laclau and S Žižek(eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left(pp 44–89). London: Verso Lander E 2002 Eurocentrism, modern knowledges, and the “natural” order of global capital. In S Dube, I Bannerjee Dube and E Lander(eds)Critical Conjunctions: Foundations of Colony and Formations of Modernity, special issue. Nepantla 3(2): 245–268 Lazarus N 2002). The fetish of “the West” in postcolonial theory. In C Bartolovich and N Lazarus(eds) Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies(pp 204–220). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Lefebvre H 1991 Critique of Everyday Life, vol 1. Translated by J Moore. London: Verso Lukács G 1986 History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by R Livingstone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press Marx K 1973 Grundrisse. Translated by M Nicolaus. London: Penguin Books/NLR Marx K 1976 Capital, vol 1. Translated by B Fowkes. London: Penguin Books/NLR Moore D, Kosek J and Pandian A 2003 Introduction. In D Moore, J Kosek and A Pandian(eds) Race, Nature and the Politics of Difference(pp 1–70). Durham, NC: Duke University Press Negri A 1991 Marx Beyond Marx: Lessons on the Grundrisse. Translated by H Cleaver, M Ryan and M Viano. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, Inc Nimtz A 2002 The Eurocentric Marx and Engels and other related myths. In C Bartolovich and N Lazarus(eds)Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies(pp 65–80)Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Parry B 2002 Liberation theory: Variations on themes of Marxism and modernity. In C Bartolovich and N Lazarus(eds)Marxism, Modernity, and Postcolonial Studies(pp 125–149)Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Postone M 1996 Time, Labor, and Social Domination: A Reinterpretation of Marx's Critical Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Resnick S and Wolff R 1987 Knowledge and Class: A Marxian Critique of Political Economy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Scott D 1999 Refashioning Futures: Criticism after Postcoloniality. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press Spivak G C 1976 Translator's preface. In J Derrida Of Grammatology(pp ix–xc). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press Spivak G C 1986a Scattered speculations on the question of value. In In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics(pp 154–178). New York: Routledge Spivak G C 1986b Subaltern studies: Deconstructing historiography. In In Other Worlds: Essays in Cultural Politics(pp 197–221). New York: Routledge Spivak G C 1988 Can the subaltern speak? In C Nelson and L Grossberg(eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture(pp 271–313). Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press Spivak G C 1993a Limits and openings of Marx in Derrida. In Outside in the Teaching Machine(pp 97–119). New York: Routledge Spivak G C 1993b Feminism and deconstruction, again: Negotiations. In Outside in the Teaching Machine(pp 121–140). New York: Routledge Spivak G C 1999 A Critique of Postcolonial Reason: Toward a History of the Vanishing Present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Spivak G C 2000 The new subaltern: A silent interview. In V Chaturvedi(ed) Mapping Subaltern Studies and the Postcolonial(pp 324–340). London: Verso Thompson E P 1993 Time, work-discipline, and industrial capitalism. In Customs in Common: Studies in Traditional Popular Culture(pp 352–403). New York: New Press Citing Literature Volume36, Issue3June 2004Pages 527-542 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Vinay K Gidwani

<i>The Limits to Capital</i>: Questions of Provenance and Politics

《资本的局限》：来源与政治问题

Abstract The mid‐2010s tourism boom in Myanmar (Burma) shows how discourse creates and extracts value in tourism frontiers. Building on studies documenting tourism's operation as an extractive industry, interviews with 60 tourists, residents, and industry stakeholders in Myanmar in 2018–20 reveal that tourism in frontiers is oriented by an extractivist logic. The high‐value symbolic goods pursued by tourists are experiences with people who are otherised as “premodern”, which tourists accumulate and exchange on a linguistic market in a process described as discursive extraction . What is theorised as an extractive relation grounded in colonial hierarchies of value commodifies people and places as repositories of symbolic capital, supporting the territorialisation of spaces for tourism development and revealing discourse to be a constitutive force in the extractive geographies of tourism.

Sean P. Smith

Discursive Extraction: Language, Value, and Capital in Myanmar's Tourism Frontier

话语提取：缅甸旅游前沿中的语言、价值与资本

Abstract Around the world, a growing cadre of investors are banking on profitability of climate change through the interface of national energy transition programmes. In Jordan, national energy transition ushered in over US$1 billion in investment capital to construct 621 MW of new wind power along the arid hilltops of Tafila and Ma'an. This article situates the contested dynamics of Jordan's wind farm development within the shifting landscape of global climate finance and land futures. The transformation of southwestern Jordan's hillsides illustrates key tensions at work within the emergence of a new, renewable asset class: utility‐scale commercial wind farms, as they materialise through the unfolding project of extracting value from increasingly marginal landscapes. I argue that the transformation of Jordan's deserts reveals a key limit to the growth of climate finance, as anticipated returns on bankable projects can only be realised through contingent negotiations that entangle social, political, and electrical grid stability. At the margins of the new wind farms, local herders were able to negotiate partial usufruct rights to maintain access to grazing lands around the turbines. This arrangement reveals the subtle paradox of toiling in the margins: while hybrid land arrangements may sustain rural livelihoods for some groups, this partial amelioration permits the expansion of financial architectures that hollow out the foundations of rural‐urban life. Beyond Jordan, this article advances insights towards grounding scholarship on energy transitions, climate finance, and agrarian change through contradictory processes of de/stabilisation and ongoing negotiations over land and livelihoods at the climate finance frontier.

Kendra Kintzi

Deserts of Wind: Aeolian‐Pastoralism and the Limits of Climate Finance in Jordan

风之沙漠：约旦的风力游牧主义与气候金融的局限

Abstract This article examines an ambitious plan to construct a built‐from‐scratch new city outside Yangon, Myanmar and sheds light on the contradictory responses sparked by rapid urban expansion. Despite fears that this megaproject would threaten the region's way of life, hopes for the new city's construction remained high throughout the project's early phases. Residents of areas targeted for development went so far as to publicly demand the city be built “as fast as possible”. In this article, I highlight the gap between residents’ pro‐project enthusiasm and the expectations of civil society activists and development actors, who predicted locals would reject the planned new city. I argue that this divergence exposes the perceived limitations of solutions held out for populations facing de‐agrarianisation. Equally, it refocuses attention on how project‐affected populations envision their own post‐agrarian future. In doing so, I demonstrate how and why speculation on peri‐urban land has emerged as a compelling mode of subsistence for even the poor among the region's landowning class.

Courtney T. Wittekind

“Build the New City as Fast as Possible”: Speculation as Subsistence in Peri‐Urban Myanmar

“尽快建设新城”：缅甸城乡结合部的投机生存

Abstract This article examines the architectural tropes used in designs which are concurrently branded as sustainable and futuristic, offering a critique of techno‐solutionist architectures that have been promoted by the European Union, World Expos, and forward‐looking design pedagogy. Through an analysis of the designs of Belgian architect Vincent Callebaut, I observe that such “eco‐futurist” images symbolically communicate an association with sustainability through the visible use of “green” technologies and the adoption of highly contextual encounters with greenery, rhetorically prefaced on the ability of techno‐science to mediate human–nature relationships, and visually bound within the design tropes of luxury tourist destinations. By intertwining the aspirational futures of sustainable design with the aesthetic sensibilities of the wealthy, I argue that eco‐futurism primarily aligns itself with the interests of neoliberal property development and the spatial and social logics of colonialism.

Maxim Tvorun‐Dunn

Neoliberalism's Imagined Futures: Sustainability as Colonialism in Eco‐City Design

新自由主义的想象未来：生态城市设计中的可持续性作为殖民主义

Abstract Integration between the American state and technology capital has deep roots in the military‐industrial complex that has structured the US geopolitical economy since World War II. This article makes the case for understanding the urban‐regional dimensions of technology capital in terms of a transformation of, rather than as a departure from, Cold War geopolitics. It introduces the concept of a social structure of militarisation to analyse the transition from military‐Keynesianism to tech‐oriented militarism, developing this concept through a case study of high‐tech firms in the Seattle region. Our analysis shows how the class dynamics that underpinned the growth of Seattle's “high‐tech” aerospace sector in the postwar period conditioned the subsequent growth of the information and biotechnology sectors. Like other tech cities, Seattle's economy remains a privileged site of technical and managerial labour within the extended US national security state.

短名	Antipode
Journal Impact	3.42
国际分区	GEOGRAPHY(Q1)
期刊索引	SCI Q1中科院 1 区

ISSN	0066-4812, 1467-8330
h-index	121
国内分区	社会学(1区)社会学地理学(1区)
Top 期刊	是

涉及主题	政治学社会学经济法学地理哲学政治历史生物计算机科学考古政治经济学
出版信息	出版商: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd，出版周期: ，期刊类型: journal，开源期刊: 否
基本数据	创刊年份: 1969，原创研究文献占比: 100.00%，自引率:11.10%， Gold OA占比: 39.86%

Antipode

期刊引文格式

有 1 位以上作者的期刊

有 2 位作者的期刊

有 3 位作者的期刊

有 5 位以上作者的期刊

书籍引用格式

学位论文引用格式

网页引用格式

专利引用格式

手工熬夜修改参考文献？研飞自动匹配期刊，一键轻松成稿，支持 Word/WPS

投稿经验分享