Argumentation

短名Argumentation.
Journal Impact0.80
国际分区W_MULTIPLE(Q2)
期刊索引SCI Q2中科院 2 区
ISSN0920-427X, 1572-8374
h-index37
国内分区文学(2区)文学语言与语言学(2区)文学哲学(2区)文学传播学(3区)文学语言学(3区)

ARGUMENTATION 是一本国际性和跨学科的期刊。其目的是收集来自广泛学术背景和推理、自然推理和说服方法的学术贡献:交流、修辞(古典和现代)、语言学、话语分析、语用学、心理学、哲学、逻辑(正式和非正式) ,批判性思维,历史和法律。它的范围包括各种兴趣,从哲学、理论和分析到经验和实践主题。 ARGUMENTATION 发表论文、书评、年度参考书目以及会议和研讨会的公告。要考虑在期刊上发表,论文必须满足所有这些标准:1。报告期刊范围内的研究:专注于论证 2.     提出一个明确且相关的研究问题 3.     为与论证理论领域的最新技术相关的文献做出贡献 4.     方法论健全和分析 5.     为结论提供适当的证据和论证 6.     用标准英语以清晰易懂的方式呈现

期刊主页投稿网址
涉及主题哲学政治学法学社会学认识论语言学政治社会科学政治沟通传播学计算机科学论证理论生物艺术心理学医学神学化学生物化学内科学内分泌学论证(复杂分析)数学
出版信息出版商: Springer Netherlands出版周期: 4 issues per year期刊类型: journal
基本数据创刊年份: 1987原创研究文献占比100.00%自引率:30.00%Gold OA占比: 45.59%

期刊引文格式

这些示例是对学术期刊文章的引用,以及它们应该如何出现在您的参考文献中。

并非所有期刊都按卷和期组织其已发表的文章,因此这些字段是可选的。有些电子期刊不提供页面范围,而是列出文章标识符。在这种情况下,使用文章标识符而不是页面范围是安全的。

只有1位作者的期刊

有2位作者的期刊

有3位作者的期刊

有5位以上作者的期刊

书籍引用格式

以下是创作和编辑的书籍的参考文献的示例。

学位论文引用格式

网页引用格式

这些示例是对网页的引用,以及它们应该如何出现在您的参考文献中。

专利引用格式

最新文章

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Moral Foundations in Argumentation

2024-7-19

Remembering Tony Blair (1941–2024)

2024-7-16

Pathos in Natural Language Argumentation: Emotional Appeals and Reactions

2024-6-21

Consolation Through Argumentation? Prototypical and Stereotypical Argumentative Patterns in Secular Eulogies

2024-6-19

Epidemiology of Fallacies

2024-6-3

In Defense of a Normative Concept of Argument

2024-4-27

Framing to Make an Argument: The Case of the Genocide Hashtag in the Russia-Ukraine war

2024-3-2

The Structure of Arguments from Deontic Authority and How to Successfully Attack Them

2024-2-8

Evidentiary Convincing and Evidentiary Fallacies

2024-2-7

Bootstrapping and Persuasive Argumentation

2024-1-19

Some Benefits and Limitations of Modern Argument Map Representation

2024-1-18

Norms and Practices of Public Argumentation

2023-12-29

Presuppositional Fallacies

2023-12-16

It’s not (only) about Getting the Last Word: Rhetorical Norms of Public Argumentation and the Responsibility to Keep the Conversation Going

2023-11-22

Correction: Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination

2023-9-25

Individual Differences in Argument Strength Discrimination

2023-9-7

Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue Cambridge University Press, 263 pp

2023-7-7

The Making of Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-dialectical View

2023-6-21

Negotiation as Practical Argumentation

2023-6-1

A Particularist Approach to Arguments by Analogy

2023-5-16

The Dialectical Principle of Charity: A Procedure for a Critical Discussion

2023-4-24

The Fallacy of Misplaced Presumption

2023-4-11

Assessing Classification Reliability of Conditionals in Discourse

2023-4-6

Disentangling Critical Questions from Argument Schemes

2023-4-6

Norms of Public Argumentation and the Ideals of Correctness and Participation

2023-3-22

Teaching the Fallacies

2023-3-22

Argumentum Ex Divinatione: Divination and Civic Argument in the Ancient World

2023-3-21

Reconceiving Argument Schemes as Descriptive and Practically Normative

2023-3-14

Fallacies and Their Place in the Foundations of Science

2023-3-14

Do Arguments for Global Warming Commit a Fallacy of Composition?

2023-3-3

Epistemic Norms for Public Political Arguments

2023-2-23

Exploring TED Speakers’ Narrative Positioning from a Strategic Maneuvering Perspective: A Single Case Study from Winch’s (2014) TED Talk

2023-2-17

The Pragma-Dialectical Approach to the Fallacies Revisited

2023-2-13

High Costs and Low Benefits: Analysis and Evaluation of the “I’m Not Stupid” Argument

2023-2-13

On Halting Meta-argument with Para-Argument

2023-2-12

The Fallacy Fallacy: From the Owl of Minerva to the Lark of Arete

2023-2-12

Committing Fallacies and the Appearance Condition

2023-2-10

Introduction to the Special Issue on Fallacies

2023-2-10

Textbook Treatments of Fallacies

2023-2-9

Social Justice, Fallacies of Argument, and Persistent Bias

2023-2-2

Locke and “ad”

2023-2-1

What Do We Mean by ‘That’s a Fallacious Narrative’?

2023-1-27

Free Speech Fallacies as Meta-Argumentative Errors

2023-1-27

The Correlations Between Parliamentary Debate Participation, Communication Competence, Communication Apprehension, Argumentativeness, and Willingness to Communicate in a Japanese Context

2023-1-16

Fernando Leal and Hubert Marraud: How Philosophers Argue: An Adversarial Collaboration on the Russell−Copleston Debate

2023-1-4

Argumentation and Identity: A Normative Evaluation of the Arguments of Delegates to the COP26 UN Climate Change Conference

2022-12-28

Analysis of Argumentation in the Discussion Sections of Published Articles in ESP Journal: A Diachronic Corpus-Based Approach

2022-11-18

Representing the Structure of a Debate

2022-10-27

Logic Diagrams as Argument Maps in Eristic Dialectics

2022-10-20

Authority Argument Schemes, Types, and Critical Questions

2022-9-30

帮你贴心管理全部的文献

研飞ivySCI,高效的论文管理

投稿经验分享

分享我的经验,帮你走得更远

Built withby Ivy Science
Copyright © 2020-2024
版权所有:南京青藤格致信息科技有限公司