Current Research in Social Psychology (CRISP) is a peer reviewed, electronic journal publishing theoretically driven, empirical research in major areas of social psychology. Publication is sponsored by the Center for the Study of Group Processes at the University of Iowa, which provides free access to its contents. Authors retain copyright for their work. CRISP is permanently archived at the Library of the University of Iowa and at the Library of Congress.

Current Research in Social Psychology (CRISP) is a peer-reviewed electronic journal that publishes theoretically driven empirical research in major areas of social psychology. The journal is sponsored by the Center for the Study of Group Processes at the University of Iowa, which provides free access to its contents. Authors retain copyright for their work. CRISP is permanently archived at the Library of the University of Iowa and at the Library of Congress.

《Current Research in Social Psychology》是一本经过同行评审的电子期刊，专注于社会心理学的主要领域，发表理论驱动的实证研究。该期刊由爱荷华大学群体过程研究中心赞助，提供免费访问其内容。作者保留其作品的版权。《Current Research in Social Psychology》在爱荷华大学图书馆和美国国会图书馆永久存档。

Current Research in Social Psychology

Rhiannon Turner

R Forrester

Brendan Mulhern

Richard Crisp

Current research in social psychology

Impairment of executive function abilities following a social category prime.

社会类别提示后执行功能能力的损害。

Rusty B. McIntyre

Charles G. Lord

Dana M. Gresky

Laura L. Ten Eyck

G. D. Jay Frye

Charles F. Bond Jr.

A social impact trend in the effects of role models on alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat.

榜样对缓解女性数学刻板印象威胁的社会影响趋势。

College students (60 female, 33 male) were asked to describe their personal standards for romantic relationships and what types of information were important for their creation. Respondents' open-ended responses revealed an average of over six standards, the content of which closely matched a comprehensive framework of relationship standards (Vangelisti & Daly, 1997). Open-ended descriptions revealed that information about past relationships figured most prominently in creating relational standards, but social comparison information was also important. Attachment style, parental divorce, and past relationship abuse moderated the perceived importance of idealized forms of relationship information. Implications of these findings are discussed. Current Research in Social Psychology (Vol. 10, No. 17) (Wayment)

Heidi A. Wayment

The content and formation of college students' relational standards

大学生关系标准的内容与形成

Pelham, Koole, Hardin, Hetts, Seah, and DeHart (2005) found that implicit and explicit selfesteem correlated more strongly among women than men. The goal of this study was to replicate this finding and test whether it was due to gender differences in socially desirable responding (SDR). Ninety-nine German students completed measures of implicit self-esteem (Implicit Association Test and name-letter technique), explicit self-esteem, and SDR. Contrary to the Pelham et al. study, the implicit-explicit correlation was stronger for men than women. SDR (especially its self-deception component) moderated the implicit-explicit correlation independently from gender, albeit in different directions for the two implicit measures.

Michael Riketta

GENDER AND SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING AS MODERATORS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT SELF-ESTEEM

性别和社会期望反应作为内隐与外显自尊相关性的调节因素

Thierry Meyer

Compatibility of primes and conscious behavioral goals : the case of a motor task

启动与意识行为目标的兼容性：以运动任务为例

This research investigated gender differences in misperceptions of gender differences in income. We hypothesized that men misperceive and underestimate the magnitude of gender income differences to a greater extent than women. Data was collected by means of a questionnaire, and respondents' (N = 314) perceptions of income differences were compared with official statistics. Results indicated that men misperceive and underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income more than women, which supports and extends previous research implying a selfreference effect in relation to misperceptions of economic inequality and gender issues.

Erika Mårtensson

Fredrik Björklund

Martin Bäckström

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.

“特权对拥有者而言是看不见的”：一些证据表明男性低估了性别收入差异的幅度。

“拥有特权的人看不见特权”：一些证据表明男性低估了性别收入差异的幅度。

“拥有特权的人看不见特权”：一些证据表明男性低估了性别收入差异的严重性。

Abbreviation
Journal Impact	0.56
Quartiles(Global)	PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL(Q4)

ISSN	1088-7423
h-index	25

Publication Information	Publisher: University of Iowa，Publishing cycle: ，Journal Type: journal，Open Access Journals: No
Basic data	Year of publication: 2022，Proportion of original research papers: 100.00%，Self Citation Rate:0.00%， Gold OA Rate: 0.00%

Current Research in Social Psychology

Journal Citation Format

A journal article with 1 author

A journal article with 2 authors

A journal article with 3 authors

A journal article with 5 or more authors

Books Citation Format

Thesis Citation Format

Web sites Citation Format

Patent Citation Format

Staying up late manually editing references? ivySCI automatically matches journals and helps you generate references with a single click.

Share Submission Experience

Impairment of executive function abilities following a social category prime.

A social impact trend in the effects of role models on alleviating women's mathematics stereotype threat.

The content and formation of college students' relational standards

GENDER AND SOCIALLY DESIRABLE RESPONDING AS MODERATORS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT SELF-ESTEEM

Compatibility of primes and conscious behavioral goals : the case of a motor task

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.

“Privilege is invisible to those who have it”: Some evidence that men underestimate the magnitude of gender differences in income.