粘合的新材料和应用正在深刻地改变牙科的交付方式。长期以来仅限于牙齿硬组织、牙釉质和牙本质的粘接技术，在手术和预防牙科以及美学和儿科牙科、修复和正畸方面都有明显的应用。目前软组织和缓释剂粘合技术的发展将扩大应用范围，包括牙周病和口腔手术。科学合理、经过同行评议的文章探索了这些新兴领域的最新创新。

New materials and applications in adhesion are profoundly changing the delivery of dental care. Traditionally, bonding techniques were limited to hard dental tissues, enamel, and dentin, but they are now significantly applied in surgical and preventive dentistry, as well as in aesthetic, pediatric, restorative, and orthodontic dentistry. The development of bonding techniques for soft tissues and controlled-release agents is expanding the scope of applications, including periodontics and oral surgery. Peer-reviewed articles will explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.

粘合的新材料和应用正在深刻改变牙科的服务方式。过去，粘接技术主要应用于牙齿硬组织、牙釉质和牙本质，而现在它们在手术、预防牙科、美学、儿科牙科、修复和正畸等领域的应用日益显著。随着软组织和缓释剂粘合技术的发展，应用范围正在不断扩大，包括牙周病和口腔手术等领域。经过科学评审的文章将探讨这些新兴领域中的最新创新。

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Jiarui Li

Fang Hua

Hongye Yang

Cui Huang

Journal of adhesive dentistry/The journal of adhesive dentistry

Effects of Desensitisers on Adhesive–dentin Bonding Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

脱敏剂对粘接剂-牙本质粘接强度的影响：系统综述与Meta分析

脱敏剂对粘接剂与牙本质粘接强度的影响：系统综述与Meta分析

This study aims to assess whether orthodontic bonding systems prevent orthodontic-induced white spot lesions (OIWSLs), exploring efficacy and identifying associated factors through a comprehensive systematic review of existing evidence.

Marwan El Helou

Sandra Chakar

Emmanuel Nicolas

Elias Estephan

Frederic Cuisinier

Stéphane Barthélemi

Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.

正畸粘接系统能否抑制固定正畸治疗期间白斑的形成和发展？一项系统综述。

Marcelo Giannini

Goodbye and Welcome

再见与欢迎

Purpose This study evaluated dentin bond strength, failure mode, interface morphology, adhesive infiltration into dentin, and marginal adaptation of bulk-fill composites used with different adhesives. Materials and methods Third molars received occlusal class I cavities (4 mm x 4 mm x 4 mm) that were bulk-filled with Admira Fusion x-tra (Voco) or SonicFill 2 (Kerr) using four adhesives (Scotchbond Multipurpose, 3M Oral Care; Clearfil SE Bond, Kuraray Noritake; OptiBond All-In-One, Kerr; Futurabond U, Voco). Scotchbond was used with acid-etching, while the remaining adhesives were applied in self-etch mode. Sixty-four teeth were selected for the microtensile bond strength test (n = 8). Failure modes were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Interface morphology and adhesive infiltration (n = 3) were investigated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Marginal adaptation (n = 3) was also evaluated using SEM. Bond strength, failure mode, and adhesive infiltration data were analyzed for distribution and homocedasticity, followed by appropriate statistical analyses (α = 0.05). Results Regarding bond strength, no differences were found among adhesives for SonicFill; Clearfil showed a significantly lower mean value than did Scotchbond (p ≤ 0.05) for Admira; the two composites did not differ. Adhesive and mixed failures were observed for all groups. Scotchbond led to thicker hybrid layers with deeper adhesive infiltration as opposed to Futurabond. The groups Admira+Futurabond, SonicFill+Clearfil, and SonicFill+Futurabond presented the highest marginal discontinuity. Conclusion The tested bulk-fill composites did not affect dentin bonding. Scotchbond and Clearfil seem to be reliable for bonding SonicFill 2 to dentin. ﻿The performance of Futurabond ﻿was questionable﻿, given its poor-quality interface and higher percentages of marginal gaps.

Maicon Sebold

Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins

Beatriz Ometto Sahadi

Marina Rodrigues Santi

Luís Roberto Marcondes Martins

Microtensile Bond Strength, Bonding Interface Morphology, Adhesive Resin Infiltration, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Placed Using Different Adhesives.

微拉伸粘结强度、粘结界面形态、粘结树脂渗透性及边缘适应性：不同粘结剂下块充复合材料的性能研究。

PURPOSE Using the microshear bond strength (µSBS) test, this study investigated the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and the extrinsic characterization layer after different ceramic surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS Hybrid ceramic blocks (Vita Enamic, Vita Zahnfabrik) were sectioned and randomly divided into 4 groups (N = 120) according to the surface treatment and aging (n = 15): P: polishing; E: acid etching with HF; A: aluminum oxide blasting; S: self-etching ceramic primer. The specimens were silanized, then cylinders of light-curing characterization material (Vita Enamic Stain, 1.6 mm diameter x 2 mm height) were fabricated, followed by glazing. The specimens were subsequently immersed in distilled water for 24 h and subjected to the µSBS test using a universal testing machine (load cell 0.5 mm/min, 50 kgf) or tested after thermocycling for 10,000 cycles in water (5°C-55°C). After treatment, the specimen surfaces were analyzed using SEM, with failure types defined as adhesive, predominantly adhesive, or cohesive. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (p 0.05). For groups P and A, a sharp decrease in SBS was observed. CONCLUSION The absence of surface treatment drastically reduced the microshear bond strength between the ceramic and the characterization layer. Conditioning with 5% hydrofluoric acid for 60 s is the most suitable treatment for adhesion of the characterization layer to hybrid ceramic.

Manassés Tercio Vieira Grangeiro

Natalia Rivoli Rossi

Larissa Araújo Lopes Barreto

Marco Antonio Bottino

João Paulo Mendes Tribst

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.

不同表面处理对混合陶瓷表征层粘结强度的影响。

Abbreviation	J. Adhes. Dent.
Journal Impact	2.69
Quartiles(Global)	DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE(Q2)

ISSN	1461-5185, 1757-9988
h-index	76

Publication Information	Publisher: Quintessenz Verlags-GmbH，Publishing cycle: Quarterly，Journal Type: journal，Open Access Journals: Yes
Basic data	Year of publication: 1999，Proportion of original research papers: 88.24%，Self Citation Rate:4.00%， Gold OA Rate: 0.00%
Journal Fees	$Details
Average review cycle	网友分享经验：较慢,6-12周
Average recruitment ratio	网友分享经验：容易

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Journal Citation Format

A journal article with 1 author

A journal article with 2 authors

A journal article with 3 authors

A journal article with 5 or more authors

Books Citation Format

Thesis Citation Format

Web sites Citation Format

Patent Citation Format

Staying up late manually editing references? ivySCI automatically matches journals and helps you generate references with a single click.

Share Submission Experience

Effects of Desensitisers on Adhesive–dentin Bonding Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effects of Desensitisers on Adhesive–dentin Bonding Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Effects of Desensitisers on Adhesive–dentin Bonding Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effects of Desensitisers on Adhesive–dentin Bonding Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed Orthodontic Treatment? A Systematic Review.

Goodbye and Welcome

Goodbye and Welcome

Microtensile Bond Strength, Bonding Interface Morphology, Adhesive Resin Infiltration, and Marginal Adaptation of Bulk-fill Composites Placed Using Different Adhesives.

Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of the Hybrid Ceramic Characterization Layer.