气候变化致力于气候变率和变化问题的整体性——它的描述、原因、影响和它们之间的相互作用。该杂志的目的是为不同学科的工作人员就气候变化相关问题提供一种交流方式。这意味着作者有机会向其他气候相关学科的人们和感兴趣的非学科人员传达他们研究的精髓，以及报告原创性在于（不一定是原创的）组合的研究来自多个学科的工作。该杂志还包括充满活力的社论和书评部分。

The journal "Climatic Change" focuses on the various aspects of climate change, including its description, causes, impacts, and their interrelations. The aim of the journal is to provide a platform for researchers from different disciplines to communicate about issues related to climate change. This allows authors to convey the essence of their research to other climate-related scholars and interested non-specialists. Additionally, the journal features a vibrant section of editorials and book reviews, showcasing the originality and interdisciplinary nature of the research.

《Climatic Change》期刊专注于气候变化的各个方面，包括气候变化的描述、成因、影响及其相互关系。该期刊旨在为来自不同学科的研究人员提供一个交流平台，以探讨与气候变化相关的问题。这意味着作者可以向其他气候相关学科的研究者以及对这些问题感兴趣的非专业人士传达他们研究的核心内容。此外，期刊还包含活跃的社论和书评部分，展示多学科研究的原创性和综合性。

Climatic Change

John M. Balbus

Jeffery B. Greenblatt

Ramya Chari

Dev Millstein

Kristie L. Ebi

A wedge-based approach to estimating health co-benefits of climate change mitigation activities in the United States

基于楔形方法估算美国气候变化减缓活动的健康协同效益

Abstract The overlap in sources of greenhouse gas and local air pollutant emissions creates scope for policy measures to limit global warming and improve air quality simultaneously. In a first step, we derive estimates for the air pollution mortality-related component of the social cost of atmospheric release for 6 pollutants and 56 regions in the world. Combining these estimates with emission inventory data highlights that sector contributions to greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution health impacts differ widely across regions. Next, simulations of future emission pathways consistent with the 2 °C and 1.5 °C targets illustrate that strengthening climate policy ambition raises the total value of air quality co-benefits despite lower marginal co-benefits per tonne of greenhouse gas emissions abated. Finally, we use results from a multi-model ensemble to quantify and compare the value of health-related ambient air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions. On the global level, overall air quality co-benefits range from $8 to $40 per tonne of greenhouse gases abated in 2030, with median across models and scenarios of $18/tCO 2 e. These results mask strong differentiation across regions and sectors, with median co-benefits from mitigation in the residential and service sectors in India exceeding $500/tCO 2 e. By taking a sector- and region-specific perspective, the results presented here reveal promising channels to improve human health outcomes and to ratchet up greenhouse gas reduction efforts to bridge the gap between countries’ pledges and the global targets of the Paris Agreement.

Toon Vandyck

Kimon Keramidas

Stéphane Tchung-Ming

Matthias Weitzel

Rita Van Dingenen

Quantifying air quality co-benefits of climate policy across sectors and regions

量化跨部门和地区气候政策的空气质量协同效益

W. Neil Adger

Suraje Dessai

Marisa Goulden

Mike Hulme

Irene Lorenzoni

Donald R. Nelson

Lars Otto Naess

Johanna Wolf

Anita Wreford

Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?

Andreas Bjurström

Merritt Polk

Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report

Abstract If local governments reduce greenhouse gas emissions, they will not see effects unless a very large number of other actors do the same. However, reducing greenhouse gas emissions can have multiple local “co-benefits” (improved air quality, energy savings, even energy security), creating incentives for local governments to reduce emissions—if just for the local side-effects of doing so. Available empirical research yet shows a large gap between co-benefits as a rationale and an explanatory factor for climate mitigation by local governments: co-benefits are seemingly very large, but do not seem to drive local mitigation efforts. Relying on policy documents, available research, and other written sources, the present paper consists of a multiple case study addressing the link between co-benefits and climate mitigation in Moscow, Paris, and Montreal. Air quality plays a very different role in each case, ranging from a key driver of mitigation to a liability for local climate action. This heterogeneity of mechanisms in place emerges as a likely explanation for the lack of a clear empirical link between co-benefits and local mitigation in the literature. We finally discuss implications for urban climate action policy and research.

Matteo Roggero

Anastasiia Gotgelf

Klaus Eisenack

Co-benefits as a rationale and co-benefits as a factor for urban climate action: linking air quality and emission reductions in Moscow, Paris, and Montreal

协同效益作为城市气候行动的理由与因素：莫斯科、巴黎和蒙特利尔的空气质量与减排关联研究

Atifullah Shinwari

Lars Caspersen

Katja Schiffers

Eike Luedeling

Historical and future winter chill for temperate fruit and nut trees in Afghanistan

阿富汗温带果树和坚果树的历史及未来冬季寒冷情况

Raphael Calel

David A. Stainforth

Little floods everywhere: what will climate change mean for you?

小洪水无处不在：气候变化对你意味着什么？

Abstract In April 2022 the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published its report on the mitigation of climate change, which included detailed discussion of the wide range of solutions at the personal, societal and governmental level needed to reduce emissions. The report generated extensive societal debate and interest in mainstream and social media. Using manual text analysis, we examined 66 articles on more than 20 popular English-language online news sites in the UK and USA and the 56 most shared posts or tweets on Facebook and Twitter about the report. First, we found that the mainstream media faithfully reported the IPCC’s priority messages, and often included the IPCC’s own critique of some solutions, such as Carbon Dioxide Removal, as compared to critiques from other sources. The coverage represented a sharp break with the historical tradition of focusing on the negative, disaster-focused impacts of climate change in favor of more positive, solutions-based reporting. Secondly, in sharp contrast, many of the most widely-shared social media posts did not closely follow the IPCC’s main messages. Less than a quarter of the posts contained the summary message of the report, and about half mentioned no solutions at all. Instead they focused on the direness of the situation and the urgency with which action needs to be taken. Finally, there was a very low presence of voices from the organized climate countermovement, who often question the need to take far-reaching and rapid mitigation action. We discuss the significance of our results for future research and for practical action.

Rachel Wetts

James Painter

Loredana Loy

The IPCC in the hybrid public sphere: divergent responses to climate mitigation solutions in mainstream and social media

IPCC在混合公共领域中的角色：主流媒体与社交媒体对气候缓解解决方案的不同反应

Abstract In recent years, international climate negotiations have reached increasing consensus that the wealthiest countries should make significant financial contributions to offset the damages caused by the climate crisis in poorer countries. Proponents have justified such action based on wealthy countries’ disproportionate responsibility for global warming in the form of past emissions. However, in democratic countries such as the United States, it remains uncertain whether such messages can affect public opinion, especially across partisan lines. We conducted a pre-registered survey from a national online pool ( N = 5,002) with a built-in experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative communications strategies associated with historic carbon emissions in increasing support for climate aid. We find that specific attribution claims that reflect a climate justice perspective do boost support for more generous climate aid, but the effects are largely driven by Democrats. We also find that global solidarity frames emphasizing shared responsibility did not affect support for climate aid. Our results have important implications for climate advocacy and our understanding of climate-related attitudes.

Volha Charnysh

Jared Kalow

Evan Lieberman

Erin Walk

How information about historic carbon emissions affects support for climate aid: evidence from a survey experiment

历史碳排放信息如何影响对气候援助的支持：来自调查实验的证据

Elaheh Asgari

Mohammad Sadegh Norouzi Nazar

Mohammad Baaghideh

Alireza Entezari

Mojtaba Shourian

Possible changes in future reservoir inflow and hydropower production potential under CMIP6 GCMs projections for the Dez Dam, Western Iran

伊朗西部德兹大坝在CMIP6 GCMs预测下未来水库入流和水电生产潜力可能的变化

Abbreviation	Clim. Change
Journal Impact	4.63
Quartiles(Global)	METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES(Q1)

ISSN	0165-0009, 1573-1480
h-index	217

Publication Information	Publisher: Springer Netherlands，Publishing cycle: Monthly，Journal Type: journal，Open Access Journals: No
Basic data	Year of publication: 1977，Proportion of original research papers: 97.77%，Self Citation Rate:4.20%， Gold OA Rate: 45.53%
Average review cycle	网友分享经验：较快,4-8周
Average recruitment ratio	网友分享经验：较难

Climatic Change

Journal Citation Format

A journal article with 1 author

A journal article with 2 authors

A journal article with 3 authors

A journal article with 5 or more authors

Books Citation Format

Thesis Citation Format

Web sites Citation Format

Patent Citation Format

Staying up late manually editing references? ivySCI automatically matches journals and helps you generate references with a single click.

Share Submission Experience