Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica

Fears have increased in recent years, both individually and collectively. Such fears about one’s own existence can be interpreted in different ways: psychologically, sociologically or politically, but also philosophically or theologically. The article deals with the phenomenon of fear/anxiety from three perspectives on the border of philosophy and theology. In 20th century philosophy, Martin Heidegger defined anxiety as the basic human mood in which man is brought before the nothingness of his existence and thus before himself. This situation of anxiety gives rise to the question of one’s own authentic existence. Heidegger’s theory has become an essential theory of anxiety, not only within phenomenology, and has significantly influenced further discussion. Emmanuel Levinas reacted to Heidegger with frontal criticism. He placed anxiety in an ethical context and thus gave the term a new meaning. The article presents and contrasts both approaches by Heidegger and Levinas. This is followed by questions for theological thinking that arise from the two thinkers’ conceptions of anxiety. These are then discussed and explained theologically against the background of Rahner’s way of thinking and taken further. It can be seen that fear is not only a negative phenomenon that needs to be overcome, but that it can also be interpreted in a positive way. Anxiety is that which throws people back on themselves and thus poses the question of the meaning of their own lives with existential urgency. The need for meaning could therefore be seen as the source of the search for a personal God.

Jakub Sirovátka

Reinhold Esterbauer

René W. Dausner

AUC THEOLOGICA

Der Begriff der Angst und die Theologie

恐惧的概念与神学

The article explores the relationship between phenomenon and revelation, primarily on the basis of Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness by Jean-Luc Marion. The focus is on Marion’s notion of givenness (inspired by Edmund Husserl), on which he bases his new type of phenomenology of givenness. In a critical discussion with Kant, it is shown that the so-called saturated phenomenon is neither constituted as an object nor can it be related back to an ego. The saturated phenomena show themselves of their own motion, they give themselves in their own non-reducibility. They can only be witnessed by the ego. Four types of such saturated phenomena are presented: event, idol, corporeity and icon. The highest degree of phenomenality is achieved in the phenomenon of revelation. Marion presents Jesus Christ as an example of a possible revelation. The manifestation of Jesus Christ stands for a phenomenon of revelation that unites all forms of saturation in itself, namely in the mode of paradox. The revelation in Jesus Christ is thus presented as a paradigm of a phenomenological revelation.

Josef Wohlmuth

Phänomenologie und Offenbarung bei Jean-Luc Marion

让-吕克·马里翁的现象学与启示

Christian apologetics is traceable back to Peter’s call in 1Peter 3:15–16. To all faithful, he requested that they be prepared to respond in a Christian manner when another questioned or challenged the faith. This developed in the first century and beyond, until the new approach of Justin Martyr in the third quarter of the second century. Justin, following the apologia on Aristides’ addressing of non-faithful as well as his legal and philosophical background, focused narrowly on a far more intellectual approach and content. This was within the far wider sphere of the general Petrine apologetics. However, with the exception of Irenaeus in the 180s, subsequent apologetics followed Justin’s specific apologetics approach, with it becoming narrow in focus, intellectual thus elite, increasingly clerical, and not for ordinary faithful. It was this apologetics that developed over the centuries until the Second Vatican Council ressourcement calls to return to original Petrine apologetics for all the faithful.

Stuart Nicolson

The Justinian Apologetical Turn, away from Original Petrine Apologetics

查士丁尼的护教转向：背离原始彼得式护教

The article focuses on the influence of bible tradition and especially of Johannine Christology in the writings of John of the Cross, a Spanish Carmelite from the 16th century known for his mystical doctrine. It will be focused on the role of the mystery of the Incarnation during the process of uniting the soul with God. After explaining the method of analysis, the author presents conclusions on Johannine influence in Romances based on the Gospel ‘In principio erat verbum’ – a poetic paraphrase of the Gospel of John revealing John of the Cross’s conception of the Incarnation mystery. Findings concerning his presentation of the Incarnation mystery in his prosaic commentaries follow next. Finally, the article offers a brief overview of the impact of John 14–17 on the saint’s teaching about the anticipation of celestial glory.

Marie Hlaváčová

The Incarnation Mystery in the Writings of John of the Cross as a Reverberation of Johannine Christology

《约翰·克罗斯著作中的化身之谜：对约翰神学的回响》

Introduction

引言

涉及主题	哲学神学艺术政治学计算机科学法学认识论历史社会学地理语言学考古
出版信息	出版商: Karolinum - Nakladatelstvi Univerzity Karlovy，出版周期: ，期刊类型: journal，开源期刊: 是
基本数据	创刊年份: 2019，原创研究文献占比: 100.00%，自引率:33.30%， Gold OA占比: 100.00%
平均审稿周期	网友分享经验：30 Weeks

Acta Universitatis Carolinae Theologica

期刊引文格式

有 1 位以上作者的期刊

有 2 位作者的期刊

有 3 位作者的期刊

有 5 位以上作者的期刊

书籍引用格式

学位论文引用格式

网页引用格式

专利引用格式

手工熬夜修改参考文献？研飞自动匹配期刊，一键轻松成稿，支持 Word/WPS

投稿经验分享

Der Begriff der Angst und die Theologie

Phänomenologie und Offenbarung bei Jean-Luc Marion

The Justinian Apologetical Turn, away from Original Petrine Apologetics

The Incarnation Mystery in the Writings of John of the Cross as a Reverberation of Johannine Christology

Introduction

Der Begriff der Angst und die Theologie

Phänomenologie und Offenbarung bei Jean-Luc Marion

The Justinian Apologetical Turn, away from Original Petrine Apologetics

The Incarnation Mystery in the Writings of John of the Cross as a Reverberation of Johannine Christology

Introduction

短名
Journal Impact	0.36

ISSN	1804-5588, 2336-3398
h-index	2