Knowledge and practices of plagiarism among journal editors of Nepal

2024-8-23

Perceptions, experiences, and motivation of COVID-19 vaccine trial participants in South Africa: a qualitative study

2024-7-28

Peer review trends in six fisheries science journals

2024-6-25

Enhancing reporting through structure: a before and after study on the effectiveness of SPIRIT-based templates to improve the completeness of reporting of randomized controlled trial protocols

2024-5-30

Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network

2024-5-16

Extent, transparency and impact of industry funding for pelvic mesh research: a review of the literature

2024-4-30

A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training

2024-3-8

A guide for social science journal editors on easing into open science

2024-2-16

Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance

2024-1-19

The quizzical failure of a nudge on academic integrity education: a randomized controlled trial

2023-11-30

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review

2023-10-24

Bridges of perspectives: representation of people with lived experience of spinal cord injury in editorial boards and peer review

2023-9-21

Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study

2023-9-5

Reporting quality of abstracts and inconsistencies with full text articles in pediatric orthopedic publications

2023-8-22

Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals – a case study of 456 trials from the Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection

2023-8-3

A new approach to grant review assessments: score, then rank

2023-7-24

Institutional capacity to prevent and manage research misconduct: perspectives from Kenyan research regulators

2023-7-12

Publisher Correction: Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review

2023-7-10

Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot

2023-6-20

Responsible research practices could be more strongly endorsed by Australian university codes of research conduct

2023-6-5

Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review

2023-5-17

Gender differences in peer reviewed grant applications, awards, and amounts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2023-5-2

Scientific sinkhole: estimating the cost of peer review based on survey data with snowball sampling

2023-4-24

Investigating and preventing scientific misconduct using Benford’s Law

2023-4-11

Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report

2022-9-19

Correction: Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers

2022-7-13

Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia

2022-7-4

ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol

2022-6-7

What works for peer review and decision-making in research funding: a realist synthesis

2022-3-4

Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers

2022-2-21

Gender disparity in publication records: a qualitative study of women researchers in computing and engineering

2021-12-1

Peer review reduces spin in PCORI research reports

2021-12-1

Transparency of peer review: a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities

2021-11-18

A billion-dollar donation: estimating the cost of researchers’ time spent on peer review

2021-11-14

Individual versus general structured feedback to improve agreement in grant peer review: a randomized controlled trial

2021-9-30

Strengthening the incentives for responsible research practices in Australian health and medical research funding

2021-8-2

Correction to: Cross-sectional study of medical advertisements in a national general medical journal: evidence, cost, and safe use of advertised versus comparative drugs

2021-6-11

Evaluating implementation of the Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines: the TRUST process for rating journal policies, procedures, and practices

2021-6-2

Cross-sectional study of medical advertisements in a national general medical journal: evidence, cost, and safe use of advertised versus comparative drugs

2021-5-10

Explaining variance in perceived research misbehavior: results from a survey among academic researchers in Amsterdam

2021-5-3

Cooperation & Liaison between Universities & Editors (CLUE): recommendations on best practice

2021-4-15

Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity

2021-3-1

Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer review

2021-2-16

Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstracts

2021-2-1

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science

2021-1-14

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 1) — a multi-actor qualitative study on success in science

2021-1-14

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

2020-12-1

Survey study of research integrity officers’ perceptions of research practices associated with instances of research misconduct

2020-12-1

Doing better: eleven ways to improve the integration of sex and gender in health research proposals

2020-11-13

Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science?

2020-10-22